Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Policies and Efforts in Central and South America

Topics / Spotlights

Latin American nations are currently grappling with an asymmetric “arms race” as non-state actors, such as Mexican cartels and Colombian insurgent groups, increasingly deploy weaponized drones for surveillance, logistics, and lethal attacks. To counter this, countries are implementing a multi-pronged approach involving strategic legislative reforms, such as Mexico’s 53-year prison sentences for criminal drone use, and massive financial investments, exemplified by Colombia’s $1.7 billion “National Anti-Drone Shield Project”. Brazil implements a structured response by integrating radar and jamming systems into critical infrastructure, while Argentina and Peru focus on securing prisons and high-profile international events through the deployment of portable electronic inhibitors. Throughout the region, a regulatory shift is occurring toward risk-based operational categories and the formalization of legal authority for security forces to neutralize unauthorized drones using non-kinetic means like radio frequency jamming. These efforts are increasingly characterized by bilateral and regional cooperation, such as the Mexico-U.S. Security Implementation Group, to harmonize export controls and collaborate in protecting regional evolving aerial threats.

(Image Source: Peru Minister of State Release)

Explore our research

Find our latest publications, story maps, and technical resources.
  • publications

    Contested Skies Part I: Drone Proliferation and Regulation in Latin America

    Dorian Kantor, Ph.D., Kantor Consulting

    Felipe Santofimio Nevares, Kantor Consulting

  • storymaps

    Contested Skies Part I: Drone Proliferation and Regulation in Latin America

    Latin America’s drone industry has become strategic due to falling costs, rapid diffusion, and the weaponization of commercial drones by non-state actors. Militaries use unmanned systems for surveillance, border security, and counternarcotics, but progress is limited by weak R&D, import dependence, and regulatory gaps. Brazil leads with strong private and state support; Mexico advances but relies on foreign counter-drone systems. Argentina maintains credible prototypes through INVAP and FAdeA despite budget limits, while Colombia adapts battlefield lessons yet remains largely foreign-sourced. Venezuela’s expansion, backed by Iran and Russia, highlights proliferation risks. Globally, China, Israel, Turkey, Iran, and Russia dominate exports, with DJI controlling much of the commercial market, illustrating the dual-use dilemma. Greater resilience requires regulatory harmonization, tighter export controls, intelligence sharing, and investment in domestic and counter-drone capabilities.

  • Contested Skies Part I: Drone Proliferation and Regulation in Latin America

  • Contested Skies Part I: Drone Proliferation and Regulation in Latin America